Gabriel Kow Is Innocent
A comprehensive defense demonstrating that Gabriel was a victim of manipulation, not a willing participant in fraud
Opening Statement
Gabriel Kow has been wrongly accused of colluding with Yu Hao (Ryan) in a voucher fraud scheme. The evidence overwhelmingly demonstrates that Gabriel was manipulated and deceived, not a willing co-conspirator.
This defense will prove that Yu Hao (Ryan) deliberately targeted Gabriel through repeated ad clicks, built trust over 42 days of legitimate business activity, concealed the fraudulent nature of his activities through deleted communications and in-person requests, and exploited Gabriel's naivety. Gabriel's only mistake was trusting the wrong person.
Yu Hao (Ryan) Initiated the Voucher Conversation
After 42 days of legitimate business with NO prior voucher mention
On September 10, 2025, this WhatsApp exchange occurred:
Yu Hao (Ryan) found the link
Not Gabriel promoting it
Yu Hao (Ryan) asked what it was
Proving no prior discussion
Yu Hao (Ryan) requested signup
Gabriel was responding, not soliciting
The 42-Day Timeline Proves Gabriel's Innocence
Yu Hao (Ryan) Targets Gabriel
Yu Hao (Ryan) clicked Gabriel's Instagram ad 7-8 times—an unusually high frequency suggesting deliberate targeting, not genuine interest in financial services.
Gabriel Responds Professionally
Gabriel reached out via WhatsApp as part of standard lead follow-up: "Hey Ryan! This is Gabriel from the @moneybeesacademy! 👋" He introduced himself professionally and requested a Zoom consultation.
First Meeting: Legitimate Business
Gabriel conducted a Zoom meeting, shared educational resources (financial planning course, investment guides), and documented Yu Hao (Ryan)'s profile in his CRM. No vouchers mentioned.
Closing Meeting + First Gym
Gabriel met Yu Hao (Ryan) at Causeway Point Popeyes and presented insurance products. They went to the gym afterward.
Gabriel's Note: "this was the first time we went gym tgt, no mention of the voucher yet"
Second Gym: Relationship Deepening
Yu Hao (Ryan) initiated another gym session and shared his side hustles (clinical trials, business events). Gabriel sent a financial planning proposal. Still no vouchers mentioned.
Grandmother's Hospitalization
Yu Hao (Ryan): "grandma got hospitalized"
Gabriel: "omg no rush bro" and "hope she gets well soon, praying for her recovery 🙏🙏"
This proves genuine care—inconsistent with a fraudulent relationship.
★ THE CRITICAL MOMENT ★
42 days after initial contact, Yu Hao (Ryan) shared the AIA promotion link and asked "whats this haha" and "how can i sign up."
This is the FIRST time vouchers were mentioned in the entire relationship.
Of Legitimate Business Activity
With ZERO mention of vouchers until Yu Hao (Ryan) brought it up
Yu Hao (Ryan)'s Sophisticated Deception Tactics
Evidence Destruction
Yu Hao (Ryan) used alternative communication channels for suspicious communications and deleted those conversations. This proves consciousness of guilt—if communications were legitimate, why delete them?
In-Person Requests
Yu Hao (Ryan) made voucher approval requests in person to avoid leaving a digital trail. The absence of documented requests for 600+ approvals is evidence of deliberate concealment.
Grooming Through Social Activities
Yu Hao (Ryan) cultivated a personal friendship through gym sessions, business events, and sharing personal struggles to lower Gabriel's guard and build trust before exploitation.
Sophisticated Background
Marketing diploma, HR experience, previous business sale ($200k), side hustles, friend who worked at AIA—Yu Hao (Ryan) had the sophistication to execute this fraud independently.
The "Select All" Proves Naivety, Not Collusion
The Misconception
Many assume that approving 600+ vouchers required extraordinary effort or individual scrutiny of each lead.
This is FALSE.
The Reality
The approval system has a "Select All" button. The effort to approve 10 leads versus 1,000 leads is identical: ONE CLICK.
Gabriel simply clicked "Select All" and approved the batch—a routine action taking seconds. He trusted Yu Hao (Ryan) and had no reason to suspect fraud.
Campaign view: 27 leads shown
"Select All" button visible (right side)
After one click: "27 leads selected" (same for 600+)
Gabriel vs Yu Hao (Ryan): The Evidence Speaks
| Behavior | Gabriel | Yu Hao (Ryan) |
|---|---|---|
| Who Initiated Contact | Responded to lead (standard practice) | Clicked ads 7-8 times (targeting) |
| Who Initiated Vouchers | Reactive (responded to question) | Proactive (shared link, asked "whats this") |
| Communication Method | Transparent (WhatsApp, documented) | Deceptive (Alternative channels deleted, in-person) |
| Business Activity | Extensive (42 days legitimate work) | Minimal (no genuine insurance interest) |
| Evidence Preservation | Complete (all WhatsApp, notes preserved) | Destroyed (deleted alternative communications) |
Conclusion: Gabriel Is Innocent
The evidence is overwhelming and unambiguous: Gabriel Kow was manipulated by Yu Hao (Ryan), not colluding with him.
The facts prove:
- ✓ Yu Hao (Ryan) targeted Gabriel by clicking ads 7-8 times
- ✓ 42 days of legitimate business with NO voucher mention
- ✓ Gabriel explicitly noted "no mention of voucher yet" after first gym
- ✓ Yu Hao (Ryan) initiated voucher conversation on Sept 10 with "bro i found this"
- ✓ Yu Hao (Ryan) deleted alternative communications and made in-person requests
- ✓ Gabriel used "Select All"—one click, no individual review
Gabriel's mistake was trusting the wrong person. He should have verified the 600+ referrals, but this is negligence, not collusion.
Gabriel Kow deserves to be cleared of all collusion charges.